Using cluster edge counting to aggregate iterations of centroid-linkage clustering results and avoid large distance matrices

Main Article Content

Matthew Kellom
Jason Raymond

Keywords

clustering, cluster, centroid-linkage, distance matrix, aggregate

Abstract

Sequence clustering is a fundamental tool of molecular biology that is being challenged by increasing dataset sizes from high-throughput sequencing. The agglomerative algorithms that have been relied upon for their accuracy require the construction of computationally costly distance matrices which can overwhelm basic research personal computers. Alternative algorithms exist, such as centroid-linkage, to circumvent large memory requirements but their results are often input-order dependent. We present a method for bootstrapping the results of many centroid-linkage clustering iterations into an aggregate set of clusters, increasing cluster accuracy without a distance matrix. This method ranks cluster edges by conservation across iterations and reconstructs aggregate clusters from the resulting ranked edge list, pruning out low-frequency cluster edges that may have been a result of a specific sequence input order. Aggregating centroid-linkage clustering iterations can help researchers using basic research personal computers acquire more reliable clustering results without increasing memory resources.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...
Abstract 24 | HTML Downloads 49 PDF Downloads 58 Supplemental File 1 Downloads 0

References

1. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, et al. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics. 2007 Nov 1;23(21):2947–8.
2. Gronau I, Moran S. Optimal implementations of UPGMA and other common clustering algorithms. Information Processing Letters. 2007 Dec 16;104(6):205–10.
3. Cole JR, Wang Q, Cardenas E, Fish J, Chai B, Farris RJ, et al. The Ribosomal Database Project: improved alignments and new tools for rRNA analysis. Nucl Acids Res. 2009 Jan 1;37(suppl 1):D141–5.
4. Huse SM, Welch DM, Morrison HG, Sogin ML. Ironing out the wrinkles in the rare biosphere through improved OTU clustering. Environmental Microbiology. 2010 Jul 1;12(7):1889–98.
5. Edgar RC. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics.2010 Oct 1;26(19):2460–1.
6. Kellom M, Raymond J. Using dendritic heat maps to simultaneously display genotype divergence with phenotype divergence. 2016 Aug 18;11(8):e0161292.
7. Fu L, Niu B, Zhu Z, Wu S, Li W. CD-HIT: accelerated for clustering the next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2012 Dec 1;28(23):3150–2.
8. Ghodsi M, Liu B, Pop M. DNACLUST: accurate and efficient clustering of phylogenetic marker genes. 2011 Jan 5;12(1):1