A minimally-invasive serial cerebrospinal fluid sampling model in conscious Göttingen minipigs
Keywords:CSF collection, Göttingen minipig, in vivo study, longitudinal CSF PK study, minimally-invasive model
Drug concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) are typically used as a as a surrogate measure of their availability in the CNS, and CSF penetration in animal studies are used for assessment of CNS drug delivery in early preclinical drug development. The minipig is a valid alternative to dogs and non-human primates as non-rodent species in preclinical research, but this species presents anatomical peculiarities that make the serial collection of CSF technically challenging. A minimally-invasive serial cerebrospinal fluid collection model via catheterization of the subarachnoid space in conscious minipigs was developed allowing assessment of longitudinal drug pharmacokinetics in the central nervous system in preclinical research. Shortly, the subarachnoid space was accessed in the anesthetized minipig by puncture with a Tuohy needle; when CSF was flowing through the needle a catheter was advanced and thereafter tunneled and fixed on the back. The PK of peptide A administered subcutaneously was performed and CSF could be sampled in the conscious animals for up to 48 h. When compared to the plasma kinetic data, there was a clear difference in the elimination phase of Pept. A from CSF, with an apparent longer average terminal half-life in CSF. The 3Rs are addressed by reducing the number of animals needed for a pharmacokinetic profile in central nervous system and by improving the validity of the model avoiding biases due to anesthesia, blood contamination, and inter-individual variability.
Caruso A, Alvarez-Sanchez R, Hillebrecht A, Poirier A, Schuler F, Lave T, et al. PK/PD assessment in CNS drug discovery: Prediction of CSF concentration in rodents for P-glycoprotein substrates and application to in vivo potency estimation. Biochem Pharmacol. 2013;85(11):1684-99. Epub 2013/03/05. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2013.02.021. PubMed PMID: 23454189.
Di Terlizzi R, Platt SR. The function, composition and analysis of cerebrospinal fluid in companion animals: part II - analysis. Vet J. 2009;180(1):15-32. Epub 2008/02/26. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2007.11.024. PubMed PMID: 18294880.
Shen DD, Artru AA, Adkison KK. Principles and applicability of CSF sampling for the assessment of CNS drug delivery and pharmacodynamics. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2004;56(12):1825-57. Epub 2004/09/24. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2004.07.011. PubMed PMID: 15381336.
Huang YL, Saljo A, Suneson A, Hansson HA. A new approach for multiple sampling of cisternal cerebrospinal fluid in rodents with minimal trauma and inflammation. J Neurosci Methods. 1995;63(1-2):13-22. Epub 1995/12/01. PubMed PMID: 8788043.
Hudson LC, Hughes CS, Bold-Fletcher NO, Vaden SL. Cerebrospinal fluid collection in rats: modification of a previous technique. Lab Anim Sci. 1994;44(4):358-61. Epub 1994/08/01. PubMed PMID: 7983848.
Sanvitto GL, Azambuja NA, Marques M. A technique for collecting cerebrospinal fluid using an intraventricular cannula in rats. Physiol Behav. 1987;41(5):523-4. Epub 1987/01/01. PubMed PMID: 3324121.
Amen EM, Brecheisen M, Sach-Peltason L, Bergadano A. Refinement of a model of repeated cerebrospinal fluid collection in conscious rats. Lab Anim. 2017;51(1):44-53. Epub 2016/04/22. doi: 10.1177/0023677216646069. PubMed PMID: 27098142.
Colleton C, Brewster D, Chester A, Clarke DO, Heining P, Olaharski A, et al. The Use of Minipigs for Preclinical Safety Assessment by the Pharmaceutical Industry: Results of an IQ DruSafe Minipig Survey. Toxicol Pathol. 2016;44(3):458-66. Epub 2016/03/24. doi: 10.1177/0192623315617562. PubMed PMID: 27006130.
van der Laan JW, Brightwell J, McAnulty P, Ratky J, Stark C. Regulatory acceptability of the minipig in the development of pharmaceuticals, chemicals and other products. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods. 2010;62(3):184-95. Epub 2010/07/06. doi: 10.1016/j.vascn.2010.05.005. PubMed PMID: 20601024.
Romagnoli N, Ventrella D, Giunti M, Dondi F, Sorrentino NC, Fraldi A, et al. Access to cerebrospinal fluid in piglets via the cisterna magna: optimization and description of the technique. Lab Anim. 2014;48(4):345-8. Epub 2014/06/28. doi: 10.1177/0023677214540881. PubMed PMID: 24968696.
Kaiser GM, Fruhauf NR. Method of intracranial pressure monitoring and cerebrospinal fluid sampling in swine. Lab Anim. 2007;41(1):80-5. Epub 2007/01/20. doi: 10.1258/002367707779399509. PubMed PMID: 17234053.
Federici T, Taub JS, Baum GR, Gray SJ, Grieger JC, Matthews KA, et al. Robust spinal motor neuron transduction following intrathecal delivery of AAV9 in pigs. Gene Ther. 2012;19(8):852-9. Epub 2011/09/16. doi: 10.1038/gt.2011.130. PubMed PMID: 21918551.
Alstrup AK, Landau AM, Holden JE, Jakobsen S, Schacht AC, Audrain H, et al. Effects of anesthesia and species on the uptake or binding of radioligands in vivo in the Gottingen minipig. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:808713. Epub 2013/10/02. doi: 10.1155/2013/808713. PubMed PMID: 24083242; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3780537.
Engelke EC, Post C, Pfarrer CD, Sager M, Waibl HR. Radiographic Morphometry of the Lumbar Spine in Munich Miniature Pigs. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2016;55(3):336-45. Epub 2016/05/15. PubMed PMID: 27177570; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4865698.
Pleticha J, Maus TP, Jeng-Singh C, Marsh MP, Al-Saiegh F, Christner JA, et al. Pig lumbar spine anatomy and imaging-guided lateral lumbar puncture: a new large animal model for intrathecal drug delivery. J Neurosci Methods. 2013;216(1):10-5. Epub 2013/03/23. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2013.03.006. PubMed PMID: 23518340; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3910435.
Hodgson DS. Comparison of isoflurane and sevoflurane for short-term anesthesia in piglets. Vet Anaesth Analg. 2007;34(2):117-24. Epub 2007/02/24. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-2995.2006.00309.x. PubMed PMID: 17316392.
Behne M, Wilke HJ, Harder S. Clinical pharmacokinetics of sevoflurane. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1999;36(1):13-26. Epub 1999/02/16. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199936010-00002. PubMed PMID: 9989340.
How to Cite
Authors who publish with JBM agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant JBM right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).