Ocular surgical models for immune and angiogenic responses
Main Article Content
Keywords
alloimmunity, angiogenesis, immune privilege, transplantation
Abstract
Corneal transplantation serves as a reproducible and simple surgical model to study mechanisms regulating immunity and angiogenesis. The simplicity of the model allows for systematic analysis of different mechanisms involved in immune and angiogenic privilege and their failures. This protocol describes how to induce neovessels and inflammation in an actively regulated avascular and immune-privileged site. This involves placing intra-stromal corneal sutures for two weeks, disrupting the privileges, and performing corneal transplantation subsequently. Privileged and non-privileged recipient responses to donor cornea can be compared to identify key immunological mechanisms that underlie angiogenesis and graft rejection. This protocol can also be adapted to the growing repertoire of genetic models available in the mouse, and is a valuable tool to elucidate molecular mechanisms mediating acceptance or failure of corneal graft. The model could be used to assess the potential of therapeutic molecules to enhance graft survival in vivo.
Downloads
Metrics
References
2. Skobe M, Dana R. Blocking the path of lymphatic vessels. Nature medicine. 2009;15(9):993-4.
3. Chen L, Hamrah P, Cursiefen C, Zhang Q, Pytowski B, Streilein JW, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-3 mediates induction of corneal alloimmunity. Nature medicine. 2004;10(8):813-5.
4. Cursiefen C, Chen L, Borges LP, Jackson D, Cao J, Radziejewski C, et al. VEGF-A stimulates lymphangiogenesis and hemangiogenesis in inflammatory neovascularization via macrophage recruitment. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2004;113(7):1040-50.
5. Streilein JW. Ocular immune privilege: therapeutic opportunities from an experiment of nature. Nature reviews Immunology. 2003;3(11):879-89.
6. Gimbrone MA, Jr., Leapman SB, Cotran RS, Folkman J. Tumor dormancy in vivo by prevention of neovascularization. The Journal of experimental medicine. 1972;136(2):261-76.
7. Niederkorn JY, Chen PW, Mellon J, Stevens C, Mayhew E. Allergic conjunctivitis exacerbates corneal allograft rejection by activating Th1 and th2 alloimmune responses. Journal of immunology. 2010;184(11):6076-83.
8. Hamrah P, Haskova Z, Taylor AW, Zhang Q, Ksander BR, Dana MR. Local treatment with alpha-melanocyte stimulating hormone reduces corneal allorejection. Transplantation. 2009;88(2):180-7.
9. Dana MR, Qian Y, Hamrah P. Twenty-five-year panorama of corneal immunology: emerging concepts in the immunopathogenesis of microbial keratitis, peripheral ulcerative keratitis, and corneal transplant rejection. Cornea. 2000;19(5):625-43.
10. She SC, Steahly LP, Moticka EJ. A method for performing full-thickness, orthotopic, penetrating keratoplasty in the mouse. Ophthalmic Surg. 1990;21(11):781-5.
11. He YG, Ross J, Niederkorn JY. Promotion of murine orthotopic corneal allograft survival by systemic administration of anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science. 1991;32(10):2723-8.
12. Hamrah P. High-risk penetrating keratoplasty. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2005;80(1):5-7.
13. Sonoda Y, Streilein JW. Orthotopic corneal transplantation in mice--evidence that the immunogenetic rules of rejection do not apply. Transplantation. 1992;54(4):694-704.
14. Huq S, Liu Y, Benichou G, Dana MR. Relevance of the direct pathway of sensitization in corneal transplantation is dictated by the graft bed microenvironment. Journal of immunology. 2004;173(7):4464-9.
15. Yamagami S, Dana MR, Tsuru T. Draining lymph nodes play an essential role in alloimmunity generated in response to high-risk corneal transplantation. Cornea. 2002;21(4):405-9.
16. Rogers MS, Birsner AE, D'Amato RJ. The mouse cornea micropocket angiogenesis assay. Nat Protoc. 2007;2(10):2545-50.
17. Anderson C, Zhou Q, Wang S. An alkali-burn injury model of corneal neovascularization in the mouse. J Vis Exp. 2014;(86).
Article Sidebar
Article Details
Authors who publish with JBM agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant JBM right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
